Why Marko Glisic Says Most Cannabis Businesses Are Overvalued

Marko Glisic explains why most cannabis businesses are overvalued, citing tax burdens, asset overspending, and a shift to earnings-based valuations in today’s market.
Reading Time:
4
 minutes
Published May 2, 2025 7:05 AM PDT

Share this article

Slapping a cannabis leaf on nearly any business plan used to attract millions in investment capital. Those days have vanished like smoke in the wind. Cannabis businesses that once commanded astronomical valuations now struggle to sell for a fraction of their former worth, leaving shell-shocked entrepreneurs confronting a brutal market correction few saw coming.

"We've gone from insanity to reality," says Marko Glisic, Partner at GreenGrowth CPAs and veteran cannabis accounting expert who's guided countless operators through this financial whiplash. "This used to be like 2018, 2019. You want to buy a cannabis business, it was insane. It was five times revenues and the craziest valuations. I mean, you had companies that barely had anything in revenue valued at billions of dollars."

Today's deal structures tell a drastically different story. Where speculative fever once drove valuations skyward, cold financial reality now dominates. Glisic notes most current transactions structure around "2-3 times your earnings, 30% down and the rest is a seller note." This fundamental restructuring represents a market correction many cannabis entrepreneurs never anticipated when they rushed into what seemed like a guaranteed path to riches.

Financial Miscalculations Behind Cannabis Overvaluation

Several critical factors fueled the initial overvaluation frenzy within cannabis businesses. The widespread excitement about legalization, minimal competition in early market stages, and investor anxiety about missing "the next big thing" created perfect conditions for inflated valuations. Marko Glisic identifies three specific financial miscalculations responsible for unrealistic worth estimations across the industry.

Many entrepreneurs underestimated the severe impact of Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code, which blocks cannabis businesses from deducting standard business expenses from gross income.

"In cannabis business, you can only deduct your cost of goods sold," Glisic explains. "Your sales, your marketing, a lot of these things you can't deduct. So effectively, the cannabis business has a much bigger tax obligation."

The resulting tax burden creates significant cash flow problems throughout the industry. "For a dispensary, you'll see effective tax rate probably be something like 50% of taxable income, maybe 10% of revenues, which is a very high burden," Glisic notes.

Cannabis entrepreneurs frequently overpaid for basic operational assets, another critical error. "A lot of these guys that got into the industry, they overpaid for real estate, they overpaid for their license, they overpaid for their buildout, and really poured in millions and millions of money into it," Glisic points out. These excessive expenditures created financial statements that made reasonable investment returns mathematically impossible.

The third major miscalculation involved unrealistic assumptions about profit margin stability. Early market conditions temporarily supported higher margins, but competition eventually eroded profitability. "They're not making the money, the sales are going down, they're not profitable," Glisic observes about many legacy businesses operating in mature markets like California, Washington, and Oregon.

Diverging Market Trajectories Reshape Cannabis Industry

The cannabis marketplace continues diverging into two distinct categories with dramatically different valuation dynamics, according to Marko Glisic.

"If you look at the market now in cannabis, I think you're going to have two sets of markets. You're going to have existing mature markets, think California, Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Oklahoma, and then you're going to have the newer markets that are opening up, like New York, New Jersey, Kentucky, Delaware," he explains.

Mature markets featuring unlimited licensing now experience significant oversaturation, driving prices and profit margins downward. "A lot of the legacy mature markets have unlimited licensing, and so you're finally seeing that trend shift where now people are exiting the industries," Glisic notes. "You look at California, number of licenses in Oklahoma going down. Colorado, a lot of these states' number of licenses is going down."

These mature market conditions will inevitably trigger industry consolidation. Efficient operators maintaining profitability despite challenging conditions will acquire struggling competitors at deeply discounted prices. "The guys that are in those markets that have been operating very lean and profitably, they're going to start absorbing those assets for pennies on a dollar," Glisic predicts.

Limited-license markets represent an entirely different opportunity landscape. "The markets that have limited number of licenses, those guys that can win, get those licenses are going to win," Glisic explains, highlighting Kentucky as a "perfect example" where restricted licensing alongside projected consumption patterns creates particularly valuable business opportunities in these emerging regions.

Potential Under New Valuation Framework

Cannabis operators must rapidly adapt to valuation methodologies increasingly aligned with traditional business sectors, Marko Glisic maintains. The era when potential commanded premium prices over actual performance has largely concluded.

"Now the deals are you're getting valued at 2-3 times your earnings, here's 30% down and the rest is a seller note," he explains. This represents a dramatic decline from previous five-times-revenue multiples that dominated earlier market conditions.

This fundamental transition toward earnings-based valuations requires cannabis businesses to prioritize profitability above growth metrics, particularly challenging considering the industry's unique regulatory constraints. Section 280E tax requirements force cannabis operations to maintain substantially higher gross margins compared to standard retail or manufacturing businesses to achieve equivalent net profitability.

Cannabis entrepreneurs planning eventual exits must concentrate on operational excellence and demonstrable financial performance. "That's also what you see with some of these M&A activity and acquisitions. The deals aren't as great because the capital is hard to come by," Glisic observes.

Marko Glisic’s Valuation Growth

The current valuation climate might improve substantially with specific regulatory modifications, according to Marko Glisic.

"I think there are going to be two sets of factors that are going to change that," he explains. "One is the banking. If the banking can open up, then a lot of the capital market activity will open up as well." Enhanced financial services availability would naturally accelerate acquisition deals while potentially boosting overall business valuations.

Removing Section 280E tax restrictions constitutes the second crucial factor. "Once that tax code changes and 280E goes away, you're going to see valuations go up as well," Glisic predicts. Reduced effective tax rates would enhance cash flow metrics, substantially increasing business value under conventional valuation methodologies.

These regulatory changes might spark unprecedented acquisition activity, primarily from mainstream retail enterprises. "At that point, you see then CVS, a Walgreens coming in and trying to scoop up dispensaries because it's so complementary. 7-Elevens trying to do it," Glisic suggests.

Cannabis business owners should approach this transitional period with strategic clarity, honestly assessing current valuations while positioning operations for industry evolution. Businesses maintaining profitability through current market corrections will capitalize most effectively when regulatory improvements eventually enhance broader valuation conditions.

Marko Glisic draws parallels to previous market cycles: "There was the initial 2018-2019 where the guys that entered the industry earlier were able to exit at a good multiple if they were smart, and then things went down. I think now when some of these new things pop up, again, access to capital, access to banking, lower taxation, here's going to be another big boom of guys exiting at really, really, really good multiples."

businessillustrationwclaim (1)j1 336 280
Follow CEO Today
Just for you
    By CEO TodayMay 2, 2025

    About CEO Today

    CEO Today Online and CEO Today magazine are dedicated to providing CEOs and C-level executives with the latest corporate developments, business news and technological innovations.

    Follow CEO Today