Australia to Ban Social Media for Kids Under 16: A Bold Move in Digital Safety
Australia is preparing to implement a sweeping social media ban for users under the age of 16, setting a new precedent in the global push to regulate young people’s engagement with technology. On Thursday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese introduced the proposed legislation, aimed at safeguarding children from the risks associated with social media platforms, including X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook. The legislation, set to be presented in Parliament during its final session this year, will establish a minimum age of 16 for accessing these platforms, with a projected 12-month period for implementation once the bill passes.
Albanese, highlighting the concerns of parents and grandparents, called for urgent action. “Social media is doing harm to our kids and I’m calling time on it,” he declared. The proposed law represents a significant shift in how Australia—and potentially other countries—will protect young people online.
Holding Social Media Platforms Accountable
Under this legislation, social media companies would be responsible for enforcing the age restriction. They must demonstrate they are actively preventing access to users under 16 or face significant penalties. Notably, minors and parents will not bear any legal responsibility for breaches of the new rule, placing the accountability solely on the platforms.
“The onus will be on social media platforms to demonstrate they are taking reasonable steps to prevent access. The onus won’t be on parents or young people,” Albanese affirmed.
A Mixed Response from Tech Companies
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, responded cautiously to the proposal, with head of safety Antigone Davis suggesting that while Meta would respect the government’s age limitations, additional support from app stores and operating systems could create “a simple and effective solution.” She stressed that a multi-faceted approach could better protect youth rather than a hardline age restriction alone.
X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok did not issue immediate comments on the proposal, leaving their positions on the matter unclear.
Industry and Expert Criticism of the Ban
The Digital Industry Group Inc. (DIGI), a body representing the digital sector in Australia, described the proposed age limit as an outdated response to the complex issues of the modern digital age. “Rather than blocking access through bans, we need to take a balanced approach to create age-appropriate spaces, build digital literacy, and protect young people from online harm,” said DIGI Managing Director Sunita Bose.
Academics and child welfare advocates have echoed these concerns. Over 140 experts, both Australian and international, signed an open letter to Albanese opposing the ban. They argue that the minimum age restriction is a “blunt instrument” and that more nuanced measures may more effectively address the risks without isolating youth from potentially beneficial resources.
The youth mental health organization ReachOut also expressed concerns, emphasizing that 73% of young Australians access mental health support through social media. Jackie Hallan, a director at ReachOut, pointed out the risk of driving social media use “underground,” which could make it harder for young people to access critical support without fear of punishment or isolation from their support networks.
Child psychologist Philip Tam advocated for a more feasible age limit, suggesting 12 or 13 as an alternative that could be easier to implement while still addressing many safety concerns. He raised concerns that pushing younger teens off social media entirely might only force them to find ways to bypass the restrictions, thereby reducing parental oversight.
Related: Canada Orders TikTok to Close Canadian Offices Amid National Security Concerns
A Global Trend with Local Challenges
Australia’s move aligns with broader international efforts to regulate young people's engagement with social media. The U.K. recently introduced age-verification rules on adult content websites, while the U.S. and other nations are considering or enacting similar restrictions. Australia’s proposal follows its 2023 trial of age-restriction technology, with its online watchdog, the eSafety Commissioner, now set to enforce the compliance of social media platforms. This recent trial will help the eSafety Commissioner provide tailored guidance to platforms on how to implement the restriction effectively.
Communications Minister Michelle Rowland explained that the 12-month lead-in time will allow for a “very practical” rollout, giving platforms the time needed to develop and adopt new age verification tools.
Related: The success of Tik Tok and the creator
Balancing Freedom with Safety: Opposition and Public Response
Australia’s main opposition party has given its in-principle support for a social media age limit of 16. Opposition lawmaker Paul Fletcher emphasized that platforms already possess the technical capabilities to enforce such restrictions, and it’s more a matter of their willingness to invest in such measures. Fletcher underscored that “if you have well-drafted legislation and you stick to your guns, you can get the outcomes,” dismissing concerns that enforcing such regulations would be too difficult.
Nevertheless, not everyone believes that an outright ban is the answer. Concerns persist about unintended consequences, including potential strain within families as children are removed from platforms where they connect with peers and access information. Faith Gordon, an associate professor at Australian National University, voiced concerns about the policy’s impact on family dynamics, as some parents may feel uncomfortable with the separation.
Seeking Solutions in an Evolving Digital Landscape
Prime Minister Albanese acknowledged these complexities, indicating that there will be certain exceptions to the law, such as access to educational services, though parental consent alone will not allow children under 16 onto social media. For now, the onus remains firmly on the tech companies, which face steep consequences if they fail to comply.
The upcoming months will see whether this legislation passes and how it will ultimately impact the landscape of youth social media usage in Australia. As governments worldwide navigate the challenges of regulating digital spaces for young people, Australia’s approach may well serve as a benchmark for other nations grappling with similar issues.
